Mini-Stacks #2: Wageslavin', Prohibition, Deadpool 3, and Annoying Children
I talk in this one about my experiences as a wagecuck
Ahh, ahh! It’s been a while since my first Mini-Stack. I know some of you just want a short textpost once in a while, so in these posts I combine several small ‘stacks into one big one. You don’t have to read them all.
Life as a Wagey
During the summer, I work for a small joint around 30 minutes from my house. They mostly sell ice cream, but also some junk food like burgers and fries. I don’t do the real food, most of the employees are just dealing with the ice cream and milkshakes and whatnot. It’s kind of an odd layout, but you learn a lot when you work a job. You interact with people who you wouldn’t normally interact with. A lot of my coworkers are still in high school, and it’s really a totally different world. High Schoolers don’t care at all about politics, but they are also clearly more conservative than college students. Even the girls. The service industry is also a good way to learn about consumption patterns. The people who order big ice creams are usually not fat, they’re usually very tall men who simply need a lot of food. The fat people, they get milkshakes, which are actually even more calorific than a triple-scoop. Milkshakes are around three scoops, plus milk, plus syrup. Fat people are generally stupid and uninformed, so they probably don’t know that this is the case, and it is decisions like this which have led to their obesity. A lot of people will also, on a regular basis, spend exuberant amounts of money on *only* ice cream. They don’t even get dinner. They come with their family and get a bunch of ice cream. It racks up like 80 bucks. Sometimes it isn’t even a family, it’s just a wandering tribe of old people, or a bunch of Hispanic field workers who all get Banana Splits. Getting food at restaurants is expensive, and it is why a lot of fat people are supposedly “food-insecure”. They get all of their food at restaurants and eat a lot of food, causing them to run low on funds at the end of the month. In the days of our parents, eating out was something families only did on a special occasion. Many women also get a lot of their calories from dates with guys. For a man, if you’re traveling in a foreign (shithole) country, a good way to get shelter is to sleep with local women who want that BWC. But for women in the west, the opposite is the case. They want you to pay for their dinners.
Also, a lot of old fat women. I know men struggle with things like norwood, but seriously, it really must suck being a 50 year old obese woman. Women are so pretty when they’re my age, and they become such different creatures by the time they’re fifty. I think you would have to be a real sick fuck to want to have sex with an overweight 50 year old woman. My mom, who is around 50, looks much younger than every other 50 year old women I’ve met, so hopefully I will also look young at 50. Post-menopausal women have it bad both ways. If they are fat then they are saggy and tumorous-looking, and if they’re skinny they become all spindly and loose-skinned. Men facially age around 3 times slower than women, and don’t become infertile as fast. Men also, at all ages, gain and lose weight easier. There are a lot of fat women because it is harder for women to lose weight especially when they’re older. This is why fatphobia is necessary in society, because it corrects for dangerous hypergamy. If you glorify fat women then actual healthy women will be totally out of everyone’s league.
Our two most outstanding demographics are probably old people and Hispanics, these groups love ice cream even though the latter is largely lactose-intolerant. Some of them don’t even speak English. When you work in the service industry, you realize a lot of people are total slobs and also a fair amount are idiots who don’t even go to receive their order when their number is called ten times. However, seldom have I received a customer who was rude. The most degrading thing about service is constantly having to put on a submissive attitude, because it’s good customer service, even when the customers are wrong. With the rise of service-oriented economies in the post-industrial world, an increasing amount of people are making a meager living through this sort of poisonous behavior 8 hours a day. Many of these service jobs are useless. My job isn’t, but if you go to the grocery store you’ll notice that most people do self-checkout. This causes a downward spiral by making the quality of workers at these places worse and worse, making people want to use self-checkout more and more. The main reason companies hire cashiers is because they feel that people like having a person in the room, it’s like an extremely dialed down version of why airlines don’t use automated planes (which is totally possible, but everyone wants a pilot on board for obvious reasons). What we should be doing is forcing these companies to automate ASAP, and using those unemployed people to build pyramids for our heroic dead. Booyah skadoosh!
Prohibition is Good Policy
I said I wanted to make a post about Prohibition, but most people asked for a post about Magick instead, so that’s what I’ll make a full post on. I’m gonna make this one a mini-stack because it’s quite simple. Alcohol is bad for you, and it is bad for society. A lot of crime is alcohol-driven (no pun intended), and I don’t just mean DUIs. I mean violent crime. People lose their wits under the drink, and this is especially bad when the drunkard didn’t have much wits in the first place. Alcohol is also just generally bad for you. It kills your gainz, it lowers testosterone, it causes obesity and liver problems and hurts your brain. Now, a lot of these effects largely disappear when you’re drinking in moderation and not drinking beer… Beer is the worst alcohol, even though it’s my favorite. Especially very hopped Beer, because hops have estrogenic compounds in them. It isn’t as traditional as people think it is. It’s always been a drink for peasants and monks, while the aristocracy drank wine or honey mead. Also, the introduction of hops into beer was also a more recent thing. The American gentry particularly enjoy liquor, because many planters owned distilleries. George Washington, for example, made his own whiskey. “Craft Beer” is the drink of choice for the Managerial Elite. The “team leader” at some tech company who spends his days downing xenoestrogenic IPAs at the Barcade in his hipster west-coast city. It’s tasteless. Craft Beer and Coffee are both bivalent indexes of class. They are meant to be both elitist and “prole”. Meanwhile at least the wine snob is honest about who he is.
Anyways… The main criticism of prohibition is that people “found ways to drink anyways”, and that it encouraged organized crime. Both are only partially true. Prohibition was very successful in decreasing the amount of alcohol Americans drank. Cirrhosis declined heavily under prohibition, which suggests that Americans actually did stop drinking alcohol under prohibition and that the rate of alcoholism decreased. Alcohol consumption was cut down to around 30% of its pre-prohibition level, and only ever increased to around 70% of its pre-prohibition level as public support for prohibition waned. Alcoholism is actually much less of an epidemic today than it was in American history, although part of this had to do with the rise of a more varied “drug culture”. A major reason prohibition failed was because it was unpopular, not because it necessarily leads to a criminal undercurrent selling liquor. In the Islamic world, for example, prohibition works because there is a strong cultural current against the consumption of alcohol. In the west, the main drivers of prohibition were women who were tired of dealing with their drunken husbands. Considering that men interact the most with the criminal aspect of society, and men ran most institutions, there was not much hope for prohibition. Institutions would look the other way (because men ran them) and male criminals would supply male civilians with alcohol. If American men were on board with prohibition, it is possible it would still be around today.
Many will cite rises in crime coinciding with prohibition, but crime was already rising heavily due decades before prohibition, and the repeal of constitutional prohibition only correlates with a collapse in crime because of the Depression.
There were many other drivers for the rise of organized crime in the 1920s. People don’t usually like to talk about this, but Mussolini was quite successful in driving organized crime out of Italy. Many of those organizations were able to move their operations to America.
I don’t deny the negative effects of Prohibition, but a lot of these were incidental. For example, the creation of a gender-neutral drinking environment in the form of the speakeasy. My point is, prohibition is good public policy as long as it is actually supported by the public culture and is not just pushed through government by newly ordained female voters under a period of blind anti-German sentiment (German or German-American breweries dominated the American market, to nobody’s shock). The cultural significance of alcohol is difficult to deny, but like most drugs it has a huge negative impact on society and especially on American society during the late 19th and early 20th century. I’ve been known to… *cough* surrender to the drink… Once in a while. But never excessively. I will have one beer, maybe two. I should drink something better for you though. Wine and mead are better for you than beer. Liquors, as long as not drunk heavily, are probably also healthier.
I talk more about other drugs in this post, if you’re interested in hearing more.
How Child Psychologists made people terrified of Parenting
A family member of mine is going through one of those brat phases, where he just whines and annoys all the time. I’m not his parent, so I just put up with it, but if I was I would probably yell at him or give him a spanking with a belt. Of course, not without good judgement. Unfortunately, yelling at your kids or spanking them is now considered by many to be “traumatic” and cause even worse behavior. This is not true, plz read these two articles:
Basically, there are two main reasons that spanking correlates with negative later life outcomes in studies. Firstly, children who do bad things, who are innate misbehavers, are more likely to do things bad enough to warrant a spanking. Secondly, people who spank their children are more likely to have certain negative characteristics in a world where “the academics” encourage people to not spank their children. They pass on these negative traits to their own children, and also happen to spank them. Spanking doesn’t necessarily make your kids more conscientious and disciplined in the long run, but it doesn’t make them less so either. It does make them easier to manage as a parent, in the meantime. Because you have a trump card.
However, these authoritarian parenting methods were discouraged by Psychologists because they believed that it was methods like these which caused children to grow into authoritarians. Psychologists, if you’ve read my post on the Jewish Question, are extremely Jewish and were scared that these characteristics were what caused the rise of the Nazis and the Showa Statists in Germany and Japan respectively.
The second best example of this is the issue of toilet training. One of the worst parts of being a parent is having to change your kids diaper. It sucks now even for men, because men are now expected to change diapers as well. Do any of you guys remember my autistic tirade on male diaper changing on iFunny maybe half a year ago? Well, I still ain’t changing no diapers. And I don’t care what any longhoused, winebarred, beta sissy boy tradcuck has to say about it!
Did you know that most children were potty trained by 18 months old in the 1950s? Disposable diapers made later training dates more acceptable, and can be considered the technical catalyst for this change, but the moral justification lies in a fear that tight-assed politics come from a literal tight ass. Very dark stuff.
And now, children are actually being potty trained even later. Watch Edward Dutton’s video on this!
The fear of “messing up” your child seems to be the biggest fear of parents now. In the past, parents didn’t think that much of “good parenting”. People are predisposed to a lot of their behaviors and will always regress at least partially to that set of behaviors even if they are “well raised” or “poorly raised”. Most of the statistical effects of parenting are just correlatives whose real cause is genetics (x behavior correlates with y genes, parent has y genes and does x, child is passed on y genes). But certain politically motivated actors don’t want this idea getting out there. All of this contributes to declining birth rates. There is definitely an anti-natalist undercurrent to it, but it isn’t explicit. It is enough to make people not have kids though. Both the fear itself, and the difficulties of childrearing which are spurred on by such fears. There are also higher standards of childrearing than in the past, which haven’t caught up with real increases in standard of living (topic for another post, but yes standards of living are increasing and it is cheaper to raise children than in the past). Only a minority of children in the past were expected to go to college, now it is the norm for most kids even though no more than 20% of jobs really require college degrees (they will say they do, but the actual job tasks do not. It’s just a way to test someone’s competence). Again, another result of these anti-hereditarians telling everyone they can do anything. Most people should not be going to college, and that’s OK.
Current News: Chandala Harris Takes the Reigns
Ugh, I’m realizing now that Chandala Haradrim (what I call Kamala Harris) is now being pushed *hard* by the establishment media. It’s astroturfing like you’ve never seen before. Beyonce songs, “brat” meme (what is this?), the neutral appearance they gave during the latter half of the Biden presidency is fading away like snow in July. Trump is probably not our savior, but I think having Kamal-toe as our president would be the ultimate blackpill experience. Obama at least had charisma and intelligence. Chandala Harris, I think, is an actual retard and probably stupider than 2020 Biden. She is also the ultimate DEI candidate. And you think Trump is friendly with the Jews? Kamala is in bed with one! So… Can phags like Nick Fuentes shut the fuck up about how Kamala is less ZOGged? Plz vote for Trump. Even if you hate him, vote for him so we don’t have four years of Kamala. If Trump loses he probably won’t run again, and the establishment GOP will spend the 4 years under Gargamel Harris returning to 2012 policies like amnesty and war hawkishness which Trump was really the driving force against.
Deadpool and Wolverine Review
Saw Deadpool 3. It was pretty good. I liked all of the cameos and thought some of the humor was funny. The Deadpool movies always gave off “this is for 13 year olds” vibe to me, and this one still does. But at least it looked nice, and it had cool stuff in it. That is a lot to ask for Marvel today, which is mostly cheap garbage. It feels really good to actually see a movie which clearly had effort and flare put into it in 2024, I am suffocated by the lack of blockbusters in this era. Every movie is so obviously not just low-effort, but the entire plot is designed so that the writers can get away with not spending a bunch of money on special effects and cool action scenes. And yeah, most of it was CGI, but it’s good CGI. So, yknow.
Marvel has made some good movies though. Iron Man was goated. Guardians of the Galaxy was good. Infinity War was pretty good but it was ruined by Endgame. Their Spoderman movies were decent even though Zendaya is in them. The movie was also not “woke”. Well, compared to other stuff that comes out. Deadpool, by our standards, is a “woke” character. He is a sexual deviant and a lowlife who would fuck anything, so there being gay jokes in the movie is something you should anticipate going into a Deadpool movie. Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman also seem to be favorites of 35 year old Xennial Women and annoying Soyboys who have “mancrushes” (!?) so they probably really liked this. Many references to old stuff as well for the Soyboys, but I sometimes like to soy out over references too so I am no one to talk.
But yeah, not really anything egregious. It is probably the best Deadpool movie you could ask for, and the negatives of it are really just negatives of anything Deadpool. Go see it with your normie friends, especially if you have a base knowledge of Marvel comics and pre-MCU Marvel films because you’ll probably see some characters you recognize (Wesley Snipes Blade is in it btw) and you’ll also probably enjoy some of the jokes.
No Gwenpool in it despite large scene of all the deadpools so 0/10
I think Sectionalism's mortal enemy is the diaper
That psychoanalytical segment with the punishment/toilet training causing the rise of authoritarian governments is something i have never heard of before in my life... Psychoanalysts come up with the strangest stuff. i found this interesting part from this article on it :
West Germany, on the other hand, has been a beacon of enlightenment. After the war, its greatest thinkers put their minds to work on the question of what had made Germans worship Hitler. The Frankfurt School philosopher Theodor Adorno blamed the authoritarian experiences of early childhood. And so, in an effort to produce a new generation of free thinkers, the Federal Republic banned potty training and decreed anarchy in the creches. The kids could defecate wherever they liked, for as long as they liked. All for the sake of self-expression. I asked around, as discreetly as one could under the circumstances. The expression Topfen drew a blank among (west) German friends. But they were all late developers, there is no doubt about it. One friend remembers sitting in her soiled trousers in her parents' car for what seemed like an eternity, and resolving to do the big job henceforth in the toilet. She was three years old at the time.
None of my acquaintances from the east have any recollection of wet pants. A totally unscientific probe conducted by this newspaper in one of East Berlin's seats of learning revealed a deep chasm between Ossis (easterners) resentful of the charge that they are all proto-Nazis because of their upbringing, and Wessis wallowing in their infantile liberties. Westerners all thought potty training was an outdated, authoritarian, practice. And yes, they conceded, maybe it did explain Hitler.
A division also emerged between north and south, Lutheran versus Catholic. One southerner remembered being farmed out to an aunt in the austere north, who potty-trained the child after a week. The mother, when she recovered her son, was outraged by this violation of the child's civil rights. They are still not speaking. The north, though, caught up with the progressive south in the 1960s. (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/notebook-if-only-adolf-had-worn-pampers-1108654.html). that part about kamala charadrim is weirdly coincidental- i only just found out she was married to a chosen one yesterday