The Jewish Question

Genetics and Politics of the Jewish People

I’ve been considering making a full post on the JQ for a while now, because it’s becoming really convoluted with the Israel-Palestinian conflict. Recently someone asked me something along the lines of “Have you abandoned Antisemitism as have a lot of the right-wingers on Twitter?” And the answer is, no, but I don’t think people are really “abandoning” it. The HBD crowd has always had a philosemitic strain, and they’re just returning to prominence. The BAPists, ehh… I’ll get to them later, but a lot of the “Anti-Antisemitism” is just “Anti-Groyperism”.

Anyways, yes I am still Antisemitic. In fact, I think that being an Antisemite should essentially be a prerequisite for being considered “Alt-Right” or “Dissident Right” or whatever, because understanding world Jewry is the key to understanding where we are today, and how we got here. No theorycel “vibes-based historiologies” on their own can explain the current political malaise greater than the statistical reality around the Jewish people. When I first got on Substack, I had so much to say about the Jews that I was forbidden from saying on iFunny, that I made four articles just about Jews. Here they are:

Judaism I: Does Judaism Still Exist?

Judaism II: Judaism vs. Gnosticism

Judaism III: Antisemitism and Zealotry in Antiquity

Judaism IV: Zionism

But in these articles, I did not focus that much on the Jewish Question — that is, what impact did Jews have on us. My articles were mostly about the qualities of Jewry. What I want to talk about in this article, is how Jews impact our current society. And this is all very much just an interpretation of the statistics. I’m going to link four pieces of media which I think are crucial for understanding the JQ. Two of them are videos, and the other two are Substacks.

The Jewish Question: An Empirical Examination by Sean Last

Jewish Representation Across Areas of Life by Sebastian Jensen

A Celebration of the Jewish People by Ryan Faulk

The Cultural Power of Elite Immigrants by Cremieux Recueil

There is a fifth thing I may consider adding to this, had I ever read it — Kevin MacDonald’s Culture of Critique and the two preceding books he wrote. However, I’m not entirely sure about this. I don’t think Jews are ethnocentric for global standards. For the West? Hmm, perhaps. But the West is the black sheep in terms of ethnocentrism (and many other things). I actually have a rather different theory of Jewish psychology, which I’ll get into, and which may provide a stronger explanation for why Jews act the way they do, politically.

First of all, I don’t expect you all to parse through the eight pieces of media I have thus far linked, so let’s take the important things out:

• Jews are overrepresented in the Banking/Finance industry, but their overrepresentation in this industry today is relatively tawdry compared to other industries. It may even be fully explainable by IQ.

• Jews are most heavily overrepresented in elite Law schools and firms, the social sciences (particularly Psychology), and in media (especially hollywood)

• During the late 20th century, Jewish power reached its height, and Jews made up around 50% of significant MSM personnel, as well as around a third of the Ivy Leagues. Today, their power has waned due to larger shares of ‘AAPI’ immigrant elites, at least in the Ivy Leagues.

• 60% of the top Hollywood executives in 2024 are Jewish

• Jewish overrepresentation in various fields cannot be explained by IQ or personality or a more urban population. Ethnocentrism likely plays (or played) a role

• Jews are strongly Liberal, and Elite Jews are even more Liberal than Jews in general.

• Despite this, Jews are perhaps the most heavily overrepresented among Neoconservative intellectuals, with the Frankfurt School coming in a cool second place. In both camps, an outright majority of intellectuals are of Jewish extract.

• Jews have a serious problem with White Protestants, ranking them lowest in “warmness” scores even below Muslims. White Protestants rank Jews very high in warmness scores, meaning that Jews have an intense dislike for those gentiles who are most supportive of them

• A vast majority of Jews support Israel and view the state of Israel as an important part of their Jewish identity

• Jews also generally view dedication to social justice as an important part of their Jewish identity

• Jews were more likely to support Affirmative Action laws if the survey question explicitly stated that it would harm White people, something even Black people were not demonstrated as doing.

• This is in spite of the fact that Jews tend to identify as White on private surveys, where there is no social penalty for identifying otherwise

• Around 1/3 of Israelis support violence against Arabs, and around 52% of Israelis agree that African migrants are “a cancer” to Israel

• Jews were historically very endogamous, but now are very exogamous with the exception of Orthodox Jews

• Jews were highly overrepresented, possibly forming an outright majority, among the leaders of the November Revolution. This, combined with the Frankfurt overrepresentation and an overrepresentation of Jews in the Weimar economic elite (~25% of the elite) suggests that the main claims about Jews by Nazi Germany were correct

• However, Jews do not damage economies through their economic influence. In fact, they provide a positive impact on local economies and living standards, and provide technological innovation. (For the record, Nazi elites were privately well aware that losing Jews would result in taking a hit in terms of human capital)

• Jews tend to score higher on Neuroticism than non-Jews (albeit, I’m pretty sure they also have a generally high factor of personality)

• Jews have a higher “p-factor” than non-Jews (higher general factor of mental illness)

Okay, that’s all of the fun stuff. Now here are the most important things:

• The American Elite during the late 20th century was around 30% Jewish

• The Gentile Elite was slightly more conservative than the general population, but the Jewish Elite was extremely liberal compared to the general population, which pushed the American Elite in general to be me left-leaning than the gen. pop.

• Jews are not only ethnic nepotists, but political nepotists. They hire Jews and Liberals.

• Academia leaned conservative or neutral during the first half of the 20th century, and was historically controlled by conservative blocs like the Church. The laxing of Jewish Quotas in the Ivy Leagues, and explosion of Jewish academic emigres from Europe during the 1940s, may have tipped Academia over the edge and caused the Ivy Leagues to become some of the most left-wing places in America

Also, stick around, because I’m gonna give my own takes on Jewish genetics in the second part of this article.

This is what I think about the Jewish Question. Jews are the primary activation agent of the Civil Rights Regime, Race-Blindness, and subsequently “Woke” in the Western World through three means:

Firstly, in America, through boots-on-the-ground Lawyering, Lobbying, and Media Production, as well as the cajoling of fellow elites. This is the “long march through the institutions” that people speak of. I am not a huge Banania fan, but he is correct in saying that “Woke” is entirely a product of the Civil Rights Regime. DEI and the like exist largely so companies don’t get sued by disgruntled minority employees or would-be employees. There is no other real explanation necessary. Yes, there are vulnerabilities in the American ideology, but if it was not for Jews it is hard to make a case for us being where we are today.

Secondly, in Europe, through Denazification. The process of Denazification involved heavy influence from the Frankfurt School and even to some extent through Freudianism. There was an idea that some deep element of the German unconscious resulted in Nazism (Satan 2.0, especially to Jews) so German society had to be reworked from the ground up in order to prevent Nazism from arising ever again. Frankfurters, Trotskyites (initially very Jewish), and Western Marxists were also used by America in order to check Soviet Communism. Many Tankies will point out how the Trotskyites worked for the CIA, but the CIA also used to be really liberal and probably full of Trotskyites back then. The CIA only really became conservative in the 60s and onward. The proliferation of American political norms in its European puppet states later on also aided in Europe’s libtardation.

Thirdly, through the spread of Communism in the non-Western world. Communism is not totally Jewish but it is disproportionately Jewish. Soviet Bolshevism was far less Jewish than Western Marxism, especially after Stalin’s purges (a lot of Jews were Trotskyites, including the big man himself) but it was still around 15-20% Jewish (Jews comprised 4% of the Tsarist Russian Population). Jews also played a less relevant but significant role in Chinese Communism. These movements would return to the Western World in the form of anti-Imperialist sentiments, which would be inflamed by Jewish Academics. People deny the political impact of the Sino-Soviet world, but it clearly played a large role in the Civil Rights Movement. Rosa-Parks was known for attending Communist meetings with her Husband. MLK collaborated with the CPUSA (which was backed by the USSR financially) and in his later years DuBois was an open Maoist.

Today, all of these sentiments have combined into a broad consensus that “Whiteness” is the great Satan of this world. The initial focus on deconstructing German culture has expanded to deconstructing the culture of Europe as a whole. The Holocaust is now just viewed as one of the many genocidal exploits of White Supremacy. Capitalist exploitation is seen as a mutation of Whiteness. The Patriarchy is even seen by some very fringe people as a creation of Whiteness.

Where does this all come from? Well, Jews do seem to be pathologically terrified of the Holocaust. I really enjoy this 4chan post on the Holocaust Mythology.

No seriously, Jews really spend a lot of time thinking about the Holocaust. I knew an autistic Jew in 8th grade who was actually afraid of the Holocaust and would cover his eyes when it was played in class. Remember, Jews are kind of schizo. They have a lot of anxiety, they feel the world is a scary place and everyone is out to get them. This is probably why they don’t like White Evangelicals. They are irrationally afraid of many of the things they represent, and are irrationally attached to the victim culture which houses many of those who hate them. Before the Holocaust, it was the Pogroms. A lot of American Jews who came here were feeling from the Tsarist Pogroms. This probably also played a large role in inspiring their hatred for the Tsar and his Aristocrats.

Before I go any further, my takes on the Holocaust can be read here. But simply put, Jews have an irrational fear of Western Civilization and White people due to the space the Holocaust and the Pogroms take up in their mind. This victim complex has arguably always been with Jews, kvetching about the Romans and Greeks and Egyptians. This is not indicative of any particular cruelty of the Holocaust, by the way, it’s more an artifact of 70 years of constantly drilling it into the American psyche with endless books and movies (many Holocaust books are almost certainly fabricated, even if you believe entirely in the “official narrative”).

However, there is a second element of Jewish political behavior, and I think this can be seen in Judaism ever since antiquity. It is two-pronged. Firstly, Jews view themselves as pedagogically superior to gentiles. They do not necessarily view themselves as biologically superior, or even superior in spirit, but they view themselves as being “chosen” to “fix the world” for the gentiles. It is through this doctrine that Jews can support Israel, support Jewish identity, and support Liberalism all at once. The idea that Jews only feign Liberalism for some secret goal of world domination, I think, takes far too many leaps of faith. Jews are hypocrites, but they don’t recognize themselves as such.

In the past, many Jews genuinely hated gentiles. It’s obvious when you look at the Talmud and other Jewish religious commentaries. But today, ehh, I wouldn’t say it is an explicit hate so much as it is an internal annoyance or discomfort. And there are Jews in history who actually didn’t hate gentiles that much, but still held this view that Jews were “a light unto the world” (like Ben Shapiro says) to justify the laws they had. I have heard one Jewish argument where “chosenness” only marginally leads to superiority — that of Rabbi Immanuel Jakobovits, who suggests that the Jews are only one of many chosen races. I could see this working out, but because I’m not a Jew I obviously disagree with the notion that Jews are the “chosen” for spreading religion. Also, because morality and faith are the most important thing for Jews, it obviously puts them in a position of superiority nonetheless. Also, the Jewish hatred for Paganism means that Jews are naturally skeptical of “The Tradition”. Yes, you could say that Aristotelians like Maimonides, and early Kabbalist Platonists were dipping their feet in it, but they came under fire in their own communities for this. They ultimately had to justify their tastes by pretending that Plato and Aristotle had learned the secrets of the world from ancient Jews (LMFAO)

More on this “light unto the world” bit, I have talked before about how a lot of Jewish political theory seems to come from Lurianic Kabbalah. In this view, the world was broken, and Jews had to repair it manually without any sort of divine grace in order to create “heaven on earth”. It was only after Jews and worthy Gentiles finished getting rid of all badness in this world, that the “end of history” would come. Now, Luria obviously meant for this to involve adherence to biblical law and piety, but it is easy to see how it can expand into a more general framework of “salvation through social engineering”. This is hardly something new in Judaism though, it’s arguably the reason Christ was so brutally killed.

I got in some hot water months ago from calling early Christians “functionally Gnostic” because Gnostics obviously the worst and people felt insulted that I would say that. But let me clarify, Jesus was far from Gnostic. He wanted to unite Heaven and Earth just as the Jews did. The sense in which Jesus was more Gnostic than the Pharisees was in his approach to salvation. Jesus says to his followers, pay your taxes, rend unto Caesar what is Caesar’s. To Pontius Pilate he says his kingdom is not of this world. Of course, it is in this world, but it is not a state, it is the congregation of believers. Yes, Christ says he comes not to “bring peace but a sword”, but not leading the Kingdom of Israel against the Romans, but to set “man against his own father”. The battle is his followers having to abandon their families who reject Christ. The world is ultimately somewhat doomed in Christianity, there is necessarily a series of tribulations before the final judgement, and it will be Christ himself who saves the earth. Man cannot do it alone, and so the most pertinent thing he can do is spread the word and personally do good deeds.

The Pharisees hated this. If this was all going on today, the Pharisees would be spamming Jesus’s comments calling him a “fed op”, because they wanted a Messiah who would successfully defeat the Romans and make the world bend the knee to Judah, at which point the Jews could make sure the whole world follows proper Biblical law (for gentiles, this means the Noahide Covenant). And in this project of man fixing the world through creating a utopian religious society, heaven on earth is created. The idea of this “final war against evil before world-rejuvenation” is not really that bad, it’s more the later idea of fixing the world that slips into secular Jewish politics so easily.

So, given all that, it makes sense that Jews throughout history have embraced utopian ideologies which have some sort of Francis Fukuyama Star Trek “end of history”. Technocracy, Liberal Progressivism, Marxism, and Effective Altruism. Marxism is probably the most Lurianic because some Marxists just have such a strong conviction towards the creation of the “New Socialist Man” saving the world. Others are more realist (“Scientific” as they blasphemously call it) but they’ll resort to Utopianism when asked hard questions about a fully Communist society. Meanwhile, only some strains of Liberalism promise an end of history and SJW/Altruism stuff leaves the future open-ended. Marx was not religious, but both on his Maternal and Paternal line he was the grandson of various Rabbis. Obviously, Hegel had a big influence on his seemingly Jewish beliefs, but in defense of Hegel his utopian society had already come at that point — Protestant Germany.

Anyways… Here are some things I strongly doubt:

1. Jews worship Satan

   Okay, maybe if you want to say that they worship Satan on accident through their rejection of Christ, yeah. But either you’re stretching the limits of feasibility here or you’re adopting the Gnostic view that God before Jesus is basically Satan. And I assume no one wants to admit to being a Gnostic, so let’s talk about the former: If Jews worshipped Satan, why would they view themselves as the chosen people? They were chosen by YHWH, while the enemies of YHWH are worshipped by Gentiles. Jews obviously view non-Jews as Satanic and that’s why they hate them. I think Blood Libels are fairly well-attested in history but it probably comes from that sort of hatred for Gentiles, viewing them as worthy sacrificial subjects in the same way they would sacrifice animals in the Old Testament and in the same way they sacrifice Chickens today.

2. Jews rape babies

   Why would Jews rape babies, Traditional Jewish law says you can’t get married until you’re a teenager I think. That verse about the hymen of babies is not saying it’s okay to rape a baby, it’s saying that a baby who was raped should not be considered a non-virgin and shunned.

3. Most slaveowners were Jews in the American South

Okay, can we stop it with this one already? It is statistically impossible. Even if every single Jew owned slaves in the South, they would make up a small minority of slaveowners because around a quarter of the population owned slaves, while only less than a percent was Jewish. Also, Jews mostly lived in port cities like Savannah and New Orleans and so could not have owned entire plantations of slaves. Stop calling your ancestors Jewish for doing what is natural for human beings!

EDIT: And whatever would a post on the JQ be without a boob break? I was already aware of the perfect pair of Khazar Milktanks to christen this post with, but I spent 3 hours trying to find her to no avail. Through providence alone, she appeared on Instagram months later, and finally I get to complete the missing piece of this post…

Here we see, hmm, very slight negroid element to some Ashkenazi girls. Hans Guenther talks about this, read his works! Stoddard also mentions it as a possible reason for Jewish participation in the NAACP. But in this case it adds a special, tropical charm, it’s just subtle enough not to cause disgust to overtake curiosity.

Ahh, now that we got that out of the way, we can talk about Jewish Genetics. Are Jews a race? How racially different are Jews from White People?

The French are only labeled as a scale reference. Do not call French people Jewish in the comments. I repeat, DO NOT do that! We don’t support LatinX Francophobia here, okay!? Also ignore the Tabasaran guy, I accidentally hovered my mouse over him.

Well, Jews are not a race, first of all, because there are arguably two or three Jewish races. I would say there are two main Jewish races, and then a bunch of “exotic Jews” who are considered Jewish but are genetically not very similar to any other Jewish groups. Firstly, there are the “Western Jews”. This includes Ashkenazi, Sephardi, Italian, and Romaniote Jews. These Jews probably descend from a Romaniote-like group which migrated into the late Roman empire. Then there are the “Eastern Jews”. Judeo-Tats (Mountain Jews), Mesopotamian Jews, Persian Jews, Georgian Jews, and Bukharian Jews. You can clearly see these clusters on the PCA above, although it seems Syrian Jews are maybe three parts Sephardi, one part Mesopotamian Jew. Eastern Jews were those Jews who migrated to Mesopotamia, and possibly those tribes who were thrown eastward by the Assyrians. There is haplogroup evidence that Eastern and Western Jews split around that time, but I don’t feel like finding the study. So umm. Go find it yourself.

Levant_Beirut_IAIII is a sample from the Iron Age Levant which can be considered as a proxy for Iron Age Jews. You can see that Western Jews look like IA Jews + Italian/Greek/Anatolian while Eastern Jews look like IA Jews + Caucasus/Iranic.

As far as the “exotic Jews” go, I didn’t bother to put them on the PCA. They aren’t gonna cluster with each other, but here’s the list: Yemenite Jews, who cluster with Arabians and are presumably IA Jewish + Yemenite. Cochin Jews, who are like Indians with an extra Levantine component. And Beta Israel, AKA Ethiopian Jews, who are probably entirely descended from converts. They are basically 100% Ethiopian from the looks of it. Don’t believe people saying “they have 20% Middle Eastern ancestry”, that exists in all Ethiopians and is not indicative of any Jewish connection. Pretty sure all of their haplogroups are local as well. Honestly one of the grossest things about the Jewish Bible is that they’re always marrying Black girls. What the fuck? It’s like Hesh from the Sopranos. *ahem* not that East Africans are Black… All true race scientists know that they are totally different races from West African Bantu Abeeds.

So Jews in general are something of a racial medley, just as Guenther and Stoddard and most race scientists from the early 20th century had predicted. However, Ashkenazi Jews are also extremely genetically bottlenecked, and subsequently have experienced a lot of genetic drift which makes Ashkenazi DNA quite easy to separate from non-Ashkenazi DNA. Also, Ashkenazi Jews do have some subdivision. Eastern Ashkenazi Jews have more Northern European ancestry than Western Ashkenazi Jews, but also possibly more East Asian ancestry. Oh yeah, I should mention that.

Ashkenazi Jews have trace East Asian ancestry which probably cannot be explained by Slavic admixture. A common explanation for this is Jewish activity on the Silk Road, as well as possible admixture between Ashkenazi Jews lost Central Asian strains of Jews (possibly related to Bukharian Jews?) I have heard it could come from Karaites who got absorbed into the Rabbinic Ashkenazim. Then there is the Khazar Hypothesis. The Khazar Hypothesis would only be able to fill in a small part of the Jewish genome due to how little East Asian DNA Jews have, but it may be possible that the Khazars actually converted to Judaism. It’s also possible that they are our missing Karaites (Karaim used to make up around half of all Jews, now there are very few). They clearly did not have much of an impact, but I have also heard that both Turkic and Alanic haplogroups are present in Ashkenazi Jews in small amounts. Oh yeah, people don’t know this but there exists a historical document that says that some Alans converted to Judaism. I don’t remember which one though.

It’s too bad that the Jews didn’t run with Khazar Hypothesis. It was actually originally formulated in the hopes and dreams of Jewish Assimilationists in Hungary, hoping that the two parties could unite under their shared Turanic ancestry. I guess they eventually realized that being Khazarians did not give them much of a legitimate claim to the land of Israel, and so they scrapped it. I guess Jews don’t have enough Turkish Dysphoria.

Anyways, let’s get to more important business… What is the genetic composition of Jews — particularly, Ashkenazi Jews, who make up around 85% of all Jews. It is very commonly stated that Ashkenazi Jews are 50% Levantine, but I have always been skeptical of this and I have always seen skepticism of it in the genetics community, because of what it demands of the other 50%.

The big issue with the “50% Theory” is that it hypothesizes basically that Ashkenazi Jews are a clean split between 40-60% Levantine and 40-60% Northern Italian, with maybe some 10-15% Northern European thrown in there. The problem is, the “Northern Italian” genotype was possibly not uniformly present even in Northern Italy until well into the medieval period. Furthermore, Jewish settlements in Roman Italy were mostly in Magna Graecia, not in the North where some unsampled “early Northern Italian” type might lie:

This makes sense — most Jews spoke Greek, few spoke Latin. Jews were also enslaved heavily by the Romans, and slave-operated Latifundium were more common in Magna Graecia and especially Sicily than in the North. It is also totally plausible that European admixture into Jews happened not in Italy, but in Greece, as the Romaniotes seem to be the “purest” and oldest of the Western Jews. It is likely that it happened across Southern Europe, and yet it is modeled as Northern Italian in order to inflate the Levantine (“Israelite”) component.

From the Erfurt Study, the more plausible model (I think) is as follows: 65% Southern Italian, 20% Middle Eastern, and 15% Eastern European. Or, 52% Greek, 32% Middle Eastern, and 17% Eastern European (problem: Modern Greeks are probably 30+% Slavic). This does not make the Jews less Middle Eastern, or am I trying to say that Ashkenazi Jews are White. I think, ultimately, that Ashkenazi Jews are not White because they are basically Southern Italians (who are already viewed as “off-white”, but I defend them from such harassment) with almost twice as much Levantine, but they are clearly not very “middle eastern” either.

Southern Italians have their own Levantine ancestry, but Southern Italian (and Imperial Roman) eastern affinity is likely largely from Anatolian Greeks, with a smaller component coming from the Levant. This is what the Southern Arc study found, and I’ve seen it in some analyses from formal software as well. Mycenaean and Classical Greeks already had a small amount of this ancestry from Minoans and Helladic Greeks, but it is elevated in modern Italian and Aegean groups.

The reason Levantine is, in my opinion, more significant than the CHG/Zagrosian type ancestry of Anatolians (Bronze Age and onward Anatolians. I’m not talking about Neolithic Anatolians) is because Levantine has a much stronger affinity to Natufians, who are both heavily drifted and have a strong “deep” component which is likely Ancient North African/Iberomaurusian. I wouldn’t call Ancient North Africans “black” because they branched off from West Africans before OoA even happened, and because phenotypically they were sort of Arab looking. But it is technically a non-Eurasian component. In the past this was modeled as “Basal Eurasian” but it seems like Basal Eurasian is a separate component which is probably most heavily prevalent in Neolithic Iranians (who I call Zagrosians, because Iranian means a descendant of the Avestan Aryans), and somewhat prevalent in Anatolian Farmers and CHG (the latter sort of represents a less basal-rich strain of Zagrosians, possibly diluted by EHGs or ANEs. Also, I am 90% sure the Zagrosian component in Southern Itals is mostly CHG-derived, because that is the case in Anatolia from the Bronze Age.

Also, CHG is in all Europeans because the Proto-Indo-Europeans had a bunch of ancestry from CHGs, meanwhile Natufian is only found in small amounts in Southern Europe, and North African is only found in small amounts in Spain.

Combine all of this with the Ashkenazi genetic bottleneck (some European populations like Finns and Sardines are similarly bottlenecked albeit) and I think there is pretty good grounds to say Ashkenazi Jews are not ethnic Europeans. But, they aren’t a “race” so much either, they’re clearly a hodgepodge. Which, again, was always what was believed behind closed doors. Lothrop Stoddard talks about this in his book on his trip to Nazi Germany, that the Nazi elite was fully aware that Jews were not a proper “race” but it was convenient to call them such in public.

Now, onto the last thing I want to talk about — the proliferation of Mischlinge in the Dissident Right. Yarvin, Costin, Mystery Grove(?), Robert Sepehr, maybe even Steve Sailer? I don’t think Sailer is a Jew, he just wondered if he was because he’s adopted and an argumentative high-IQ type. The Groypers, after calling a bajillion people Jews, found out one of their enemies (BAP) really was a half-Jew and now they just call everyone who says anything against them a Jew. It’s the most autistic shit out there. I don’t know what is causing this great wave of Mischlinge but I don’t think it is some sort of “Clairmont Peter Thiel Mossad op”. Why would they choose people of Jewish heritage to spread Zionist Straussianism to the online right? Do they not have hundreds of thousands of gentile neocons at their disposal? Also, why only secular/converted half-Jews and quarter-Jews? Can’t find any purebloods? BAP, I don’t see eye to eye with on a lot of things, and he really causes a lot of trouble with terrible opsec and being El Mestizaje en Romania, but his podcasts are really good and make me laugh as well and are also very good info on random shit. Also, I would very much like to read Selective Breeding and the Birth of Philosophy. I’ve heard things from it which I agree with strongly. Yarvin is totally astroturfed even though he’s still a really smart guy with some interesting (albeit autistic) ideas. I don’t know why he’s called Alt-Right, he’s a Libertarian who like many Lolberts back in the good old days believed in Race Realism. There was some new guy who was doxxed and people found out he was a Jewish Academic too, I don’t know who but I heard about it because he was very attractive while his doxxer was an ugly leftist.

I think most of these guys just got into the right-wing stuff because they look White and they feel White and don’t have much connection with their Jewish heritage. It’s the same as the bajillions of Mexican Wignats except most of those guys don’t even look White or have any reason to view themselves as White so if they can do it then I don’t see why people assume a conspiracy is afoot when these Halbjudes do it.