78 Comments
User's avatar
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

There was a very pretty Jewess with a nice pair of breasts on TikTok who could have made for a nice boob break in this. It's not the one I used before, it's a different one. If I find her I'll add her to the end

P.S. it is not the one that shows up on Google images, she looks more youthful

Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

Also, on Jewish IQ, I believe Jews actually do have high IQ because they have high IQ PGS. So it's hard to deny. But it is definitely not 115, it is probably 107-110, and I think the 'Holocaust' had a big effect on this. Shtetl Jews were really dumb and sheltered, a lot of them in the 19th century didn't even believe the Americas existed. They were also thuggish and constantly killed their rivals over feuds. The intelligent ones got more assimilated or went to UK/America where they developed high IQ, and this would develop in Europe too because retard village Jews got plowed by German anti-Partisan forces

Expand full comment
Lee Katz's avatar

I know it's been over a year later, but you pointed out something with your boob break that I've noticed myself. Why is it that a lot of Ashkenazi Jews have a somewhat Subsaharan vibe? What is it about their (((our))) admixture that causes these phenotypic traits? Iberomaurusian or Natufian input? A lot of Ashkenazim have a slight "tropical vibe" which shouldn't make any sense based on (((our))) admixture and geographical origin.

Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

Ashkenazi Jews do have a bit of Nafri, so it is possible it is a North African type. More likely it’s just a weird combination of Levantine and Euro features

Expand full comment
Eugene's avatar

Idk, a lot of the “BAP” crowd (not necessarily BAP himself) tend to push an ironic philosemitism combined with a pro-israel (Zionist) position which I’ve seen a lot of people adopt. Due to this sphere’s overlap with HBD clowns, essentially this entire crowd is insanely pro-Jewish. Shit, it’s becoming quite common to see these people calling any criticism of kikes “low class”, or “slave morality”. The ever so frequent charge of “low IQ antisemitism”. I just think it’s best for Whites to not be ruled by a stateless parasite who is hostile to their Interests, but apparently this makes me comparable to some ghetto nigger complaining about whitey.

Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

Yep, that is correct. BAP himself isn't that abrasive on the Jewish subject but he's clearly become less vocally radical after his identity was exposed methinks. But a lot of the people in the BAP circle are annoying philosemites who either are Jews themselves or had some sort of cognitive dissonance brain explosion finding out their idol was a Jew. Also, BAP associates with a lot of milquetoast grifters like the Man's World Magazine guy who only serve to deradicalize and defang any message from BAP. I also doubt Sol Brah believes half of the shit he says, about "suntanning your balls". Give me a break

Expand full comment
Retribution's avatar

Groyper tier bitching and whining about how jews are devil worshippers and they control the planet and we are totally powerless to do anything IS ghetto nigger type behavior. Groypers tend to talk about the "ELITES" and accuse any wealthy white person who is not a devout Roman Catholic of being secretly jewish. Remember when they were trying to call Napoleon a jew?

Expand full comment
Eugene's avatar

I never even mentioned groypers, and although there are valid criticisms of them, what I was talking about is a separate issue that’s only in part caused by them. Still, if you let groypers turn into a pro-kike faggot you are just a contrarian midwit.

Expand full comment
Retribution's avatar

I just meant that usually when BAP guys "push ironic philosemitism" or whatever they are talking to retarded groyper types.

Expand full comment
Eugene's avatar

I don’t disagree, though for some people it’s a genuine sentiment due to Jewish ancestry. What I was getting at was more so an attack on the HBD crowd which, as the OP mentioned, has always had a philosemitic orientation. There’s a constant attempt to downplay the JQ by appealing to their super genius IQ. As if their IQ is hardly a justification for their outsized influence, an influence that is overwhelmingly at odds with white interests.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jun 18, 2024Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Eugene's avatar

Jews also hate white people and western civilization. There is no “side” for the white man to take. Jewish & Zionist interests should be subordinated to white interests. They should fear us.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jun 18, 2024
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

Correct, I find nothing more stupid than some quarter-Jew Hapa talking about how Jewish they are. The thing with Jews is that they are a self-destructive people. That is what makes them so peculiarly awful.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jun 21, 2024
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

I don't think I ever said that, maybe you are thinking of someone else. I am a math major.

Expand full comment
Shade of Achilles's avatar

'younger jews, many of them mischlings, will come to identify strongly with white and western heritage.'

This is truth

Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

I don't know about that tbh. In the past almost all Mischlinge did not identify as Jewish, but now possibly a majority of them identify as Jewish due to our philosemitic society and the more lax feels-based Judaism which permeates today. Many Jews today are in fact Mischlinge and not 100% Jewish, but strongly identify with their Jewish heritage, a complete 180 from the past

Expand full comment
Shade of Achilles's avatar

How do you know so much about the jooz bro? You hang out with em bro? Mayhap you're one yrself BRO! Maybe you're hasbara trying to make out that the joos aren't going right because you want us to believe they're going left because that would mean that y

No no ok I get your point. I meant that it seems to me (FROM A DISTANCE) that they are huwhite-shifting because their enemies see them that way--only worse.

Admittedly I don't have much to do with em...UNLIKE YOU OBVIOUSLY...but couldn't mischlings be both identifying more strongly as jewish *and* becoming less averse to finding 'white allies' as their position on the intersectional stack collapses out from under them? I don't see any contradiction.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jun 23, 2024
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
-Max's avatar

Was waiting the whole time for a n Abby Shapiro boobv break, le sigh…

Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

No compromising, there was a really beautiful Jewess on TikTok but I can no longer find her. I spent hours trying to find her again but to no avail. Because of that I have foresaken the boob break of this post

Expand full comment
TTD's avatar

The best way to solve the Israel-Palestine conflict would be glassing the entire region and giving it to some random fat Greek or Italian nigga, just to see what happens.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jun 18, 2024
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

The Middle East should be divided between the Turks, Italians, and English.

Expand full comment
TTD's avatar

Give the Levant to an Italian sub shop owner, Iraq and Kuwait to a proper British bloke from Northumbria, and Syria to a Turkish Kebab shop owner. Would solve all of the region’s problems.

Expand full comment
TTD's avatar

Excellent read! One question I have, does being genetically bottlenecked mean inbreeding?

Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

Yeah, sort of. It really means that there was once a big population, and then it shrunk to a very small size, and then it grew from there. Technically this process involves a higher inbreeding coefficient because the gene pool gets smaller and more familiar with itself. But I don't think this means Jews were actually inbreeding a lot more than everyone else (i.e. having kids with their first cousins and siblings)

Expand full comment
Gorge's avatar

I had many Jewish friends as I was growing up and I wish they were integratable into cracker society but they are simply not. TKD

Expand full comment
Hessian's avatar

Every so often I get this desire to start writing a book concerning Jews and how they have affected western civ and the U.S. up to this point in time, but I really do not have the time and my writing skills have atrophied thanks to military. I think that you however could definitely produce something palatable for the unwashed and unaware masses, ever considered it ?

Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

I could probably write a book by compiling all of my best essays on Substack together, and albeit I do have various essays on the Jews here which combined could make a decently sized pamphlet.

Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

Ehh, I'm not sure if I could drag such a book past 100 pages or so. Writing books requires a special ability to drag the reader along long, winded sections that don't come off as verbose or filler. I don't know if I have this skill

Expand full comment
anon's avatar

> Jews were more likely to support Affirmative Action laws if the survey question explicitly stated that it would harm White people, something even Black people were not demonstrated as doing.

The survey that came from only listed it as a 1% increase. The margin of error for the entire survey was 1.8%. The MoE for the individual groups (jews) wasn't stated but it was definitely a lot higher than this. So, I don't think this is good evidence since it wasn't statistically significant.

Good article though, are you planning on making more about the JQ/jews? This is another blog I think you might have interest in (if you haven't seen it already): https://karlradl14.substack.com/

Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

Hmm, interesting. I always sort of felt like that statistic needed some heftier evidence behind it.

I don’t know if I’ll make more JQ posts. I will if I have an idea related to Jews.

Expand full comment
anon's avatar

I saw you post this in another author's comment section: https://deepleft.substack.com/p/mischling-vs-mongrel/comments#comment-63038533

>Jewish intermarriage was so low in the past not because it didn’t happen, but because virtually all Jews who intermarried converted to Christianity or secularized. It was actually fairly common in Germany at the time so much so that Jews seemed to be on a rather serious demographic decline. There were not much Orthodox Jews in Germany, most were assimilated.

Do you have any sources on this? A main argument of philosemites is to use jewish intermarriage rates as evidence that they are not ethnocentric.

Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

There are sources, but they’re in German.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mischling#Jewish_Mischlinge_as_Christian_converts

77% of German non-Jews with Jewish ancestry were Protestants in 1933, and I’m pretty sure the remainder is mostly Catholics or irreligious but the original source is in German

There are also genetic studies proving that Jews have had very little non Jewish admixture per generation in the past centuries, I can find sources for these if you want to demonstrate the historical endogamy of European Jews. They make it hard for converts and furthermore they practice a silly religion so why would European gentiles convert?

Expand full comment
anon's avatar

> There are also genetic studies proving that Jews have had very little non Jewish admixture per generation in the past centuries

Wouldn't this conflict with what you said earlier? If jewish intermarriage has always happened, but has been obscured by the fact that they were converts, that still means they married with gentiles more, which would increase their non jewish admixture? Or am I misunderstanding?

Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

Jewish intermarriage hasn't always happened, it specifically started to increase after Napoleon's "liberation" of the Jews and the Jewish Enlightenment. But Jews were assimilating into gentile culture, no gentiles felt any pressure to assimilate into Jewish culture. So all of these Jews who were marrying gentiles were probably converting to Christianity (easy) instead of getting gentiles to convert to Judaism (convoluted and hard). The resulting children would not identify as Jews, not live amongst Jews, and marry more gentiles, so their descendants today are not focused on in Jewish DNA studies. In fact, most of them might not even know they have Jewish ancestry at all. But for the record, their impact on the gentile genepool is also insignificant, because Jews made up such a small portion of the population.

In places where Jews made up a larger share of the population, like the Pale of Settlement, Jews were still living in Shtetls and not assimilating or intermarrying in significant numbers. Assimilation was mainly a German-Jewish and Hungarian-Jewish phenomenon.

All of that being said, there were periods of Jewish history where Jews were actively proselytizing to gentiles. Namely, the Roman period, where they actually got kicked out of Rome for this habit. It is likely that Jews are either plurality or majority descended from Italian converts for this reason. I suspect that the Slavic ancestry of Jews is due to the relatively high status Jews had in Poland-Lithuania, causing some peasants to convert to Judaism.

Relevant posts:

https://sectionalismnotes.substack.com/p/judaism-iii-antisemitism-and-zealotry

https://sectionalismnotes.substack.com/p/the-slavs-a-comprehensive-analysis

Expand full comment
anon's avatar

Sorry for the late reply, but I saw you post another comment on that same substack that had some links showing that gay people were mentally ill. I can't find this comment for some reason, do you have it?

Expand full comment
TTDII's avatar

S-S-SISA…

Expand full comment
Oranon's avatar

Do you believe that south arabians (non arabs like mehris) invaded east africa and contributed to the founding of the ethio semitic population? South arabians are such an interesting population in general they formed a significant portion of the early caliphal armies despite the fact that people insist on calling them arabs for some reason, they also went communist for a while bc the zanzibari monarchy of Oman kept oppressing them.

Also that weird semitic obsession with negresses needs to be studied, arabs were the og coomers they wrote manuals on the best type of slaves for sex and ranked african women second but would be better than berbers if it weren’t for their smell. It’s pretty funny how yemenis are like 100% semitic in ydna but like 30% groid in mt dna.

Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

>Do you believe that south arabians (non arabs like mehris) invaded east africa and contributed to the founding of the ethio semitic population?

Presumably, yeah.

>Also that weird semitic obsession with negresses needs to be studied, arabs were the og coomers they wrote manuals on the best type of slaves for sex and ranked african women second but would be better than berbers if it weren’t for their smell.

KEEEEEEEK Arabs really are such a bizarre and hilariously horny people only beaten out by Indians. But yeah the thing for negro women seems to come around once in a while in history, it's odd since they really are so alien. I was confused when Nixon said that he sees a sexual charm in them. Frenchmen were known for loving the Mulattas as well.

It speaks to the difference between Arabs and Persians as well. The Iranian Bundahishn calls Black people the chimera hybrid beasts of human beings, monkeys, and divs (demons)

Expand full comment
Viddao's avatar

I am German, therefore I do not understand.

Expand full comment
Shade of Achilles's avatar

All post Fall of Granada Moroccan sultans were at least half West African (probably more like 15/16ths). Berbers love black women too.

They also had a slave bodyguard of blacks who beat the shit out of white construction worker slaves--who when allowed to marry HAD to marry black women. The (more than half black sultan believed that half-breeds made the best slaves.

Mixed race people are strange.

Expand full comment
Oranon's avatar

those early modern sultans of morocco were really strange people, in fact the conquest of the songhai which led to the formation of the black armies was actually led by armies that were entirely andalusian and led by some blue eyed spanish muslim. However, the andalusians were completely assimilated there and their descendants are now known as the “arma” (not even da andalusianz could escape dat negress booty gahdamn!)

I’m pretty sure the main reason the andalusians lost power in morocco was bc of these mixed race sultans preferring fellow dark skins too. Honestly a shame north africa wasn’t at least turned into a muslim european ruled area lol, then they wouldn’t have had to go through that mutting.

Expand full comment
Shade of Achilles's avatar

Conquest of Morocco by gigantic Bosnian Muslim mountaineers wen?

Sulejman and Enver claw one back for Evropa!

Expand full comment
Oranon's avatar

thinking back on it the janissaries must’ve been one hell of an army considering their main source of troops were from the tallest people of the world

Expand full comment
Oranon's avatar

i forgot to add this but there’s actually a significant bosniak diaspora in the arab world, they’re called “Bushnaqs” and are mostly centred in palestine , jordan and saudi arabia

Expand full comment
username.bot's avatar

do you have any book/resource on that era/place?

Expand full comment
Oranon's avatar

on what? for the arma i remember it from a book called Muslims in Spain: 1500 to 1614

Expand full comment
username.bot's avatar

Thank you, I meant interesting stuff in/after the Reconquista era in Spain/Northwestern Africa in general.

Expand full comment
Oranon's avatar

Lol u should see this wiki quote page (https://en.m.wikiquote.org/wiki/Medieval_Arab_attitudes_to_Black_people)

Ibn Khaldun to me reminds me a lot of an “arab” Martin luther (even though they were both acc european) , like both autist wordcels .

i find it especially funny how ibn khaldun says slavs are basically the negroes of whites (polacks in haiti strike a chord), which honestly i don’t blame him because due to the frequent viking and magyar raids there was a huge slavic enslavement that even spread to andalusia where the spanish levante was actually ruled by muslim slavs during the first taifa period. It’s even funnier with the other andalusian Ibn said who said (no pun intended) that indians despite being black are a good people and the indians replying to that quote tweet were complaining about them not being black. It sometimes does make me wonder if medieval muslims really were the og actual racists and not just ethnocentrists

Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

Muslims have always been racist because they are familiar with Black people much more than Europeans ever were. It was true before Islam too.

Expand full comment
horactix's avatar

AGHHH!!! Maybe the ironic yet constant Jewlarp has gotten to me, but honestly I'll take economically-efficient Jews over welfare border-hoppers nowadays.

I'm so friggin tired of groypers pushing mudcreatures that have "low IQ antisemitism" which you talked about (um, BASTE? they hate JOOs?!) because muh poor palestinian terrorist brothas dindu nuffin.

Right-wing Twiggers (also groypers) say "antisemitism is growing! this is a good thing" Except the only notable and outspoken growth is amongst the brown demographic which will generally regress the ideology, associating it with dumber people. BASICALLY the antisemitism fandom is not being gatekept, Undertale is invading.

Even Hitler supported Jewish resettlement in Palestine. I'm such a good goy, perhaps my bank shall give me a $5 grant for those statements above.

Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

You must understand, the "economically efficient Jews" were the ones who let in the welfare border-hoppers. Just because a bunch of shit colored animals have become superficially antisemitic doesn't mean you should ignore that Jews will nonetheless choose that shit-colored animal over a White evangelical any day due to their pathological fear of White Europeans

Expand full comment
horactix's avatar

I know that. It's all fucked up, can somebody rewire/remove all Jewish brains please

Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

so trve it would be funny

Expand full comment
Aodhan MacMhaolain's avatar

No. They get the bog

Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

The bog craves them… to deprive the bog of Jews would upset the bog and could cause great terror

Expand full comment
Aodhan MacMhaolain's avatar

All hail the bog! The great swallower of ignoble folk! Hail to the bog, may it swallow all nogs, wogs, and the unholy ZOG.

Expand full comment
TTD's avatar

I got an idea for a post: India

Expand full comment
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

That's not a bad idea. Not sure if there is quite as much to talk about with regards to India as there is with China, but I'll keep it in my thoughts.

Expand full comment
Elimination Essays's avatar

Great post with some good links for further reading. And yes, big missed opportunity for a boob break.

Expand full comment
Eddie's avatar

Hold on, I need to get my tea to finish boiling before reading this

Expand full comment
TTD's avatar

Actually, I just realized something. You mentioned that Jews have east asian admixture, so my hypothesis is that they have some sort of Udmurt or Udmurt-like admixture in their blood. This would explain both the asian admixture and their supposedly high rate of red hair.

Expand full comment