![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F8481aaa2-d314-458c-94bb-10f7da8f4ae3_1440x1446.png)
Election day is tomorrow. A lot of people are thinking that they shouldn’t vote, that you shouldn’t pick two fruits from the same rotten tree. Well, I think that you should vote if it is not statistically near impossible for your desired candidate to win in your state. And even then, it doesn’t hurt to vote. Just to stat-pad. There is functionally zero cost to voting, so it is better to vote for the better of two evils than none at all. I don’t think Trump is the “better of two evils”, I think he deserves a lot of credit for a number of things. Trump has a good foreign policy record. He is the one who negotiated the end of U.S. involvement in Afghanistan, he withdrew from Syria after the defeat of ISIS, which I think I have to clarify was not done without its fair share of controversy. The war hawks were kvetching that he abandoned the Kurds… An ethnic group that I cannot say I am fond of despite a mild interest in Yazidism. He vastly improved relations between South Korea and the U.S. with North Korea. I remember in the Obama years, North Korea was a much more significant cultural Geist. Trump’s willingness to play ball with the “bad guys” was a nice break from the typical World Police chicanery you see from American politicians. Low points of Trump’s foreign policy are probably the bombings in Syria and the assassination of Soleimani. Both were overstepping, but Trump has at least came out against any sort of regime change in Iran recently. I have mixed opinions on Tariffs. They’re bad for the prices in the short term which makes them basically off-limits in a mass democracy, but I don’t think Trump actually intends to replace income tax with tariffs. It’s just a mantra. Trump was less of a NATO hawk than Biden-Harris which is a good thing. European countries will benefit from being taken off the money IV (mostly) and being forced to pay for their own defense, but I am still in favor of American military alliance with the NATO countries. Russia could frankly take half of Eastern Europe and they would still be a non-threat to American global hegemony.
Most of the stuff Trump gets hate for is stuff he didn’t really have that much control over as president. He did what he could on immigration, it was very difficult when most of congress was comprised of democrats and lukewarm or never-Trump Republicans. The GOP now is much more Trumpish, so if Trump wins and there is a Republican legislature then we will be in a much better position than in 2016 immigration-wise. Trump deserves a lot of credit for making immigration the central issue of the Republican party. Many Republicans under Obunga were considering amnesty, today they are considering mass deportations. Trump gets a lot of hate for the Bump Stock ban, which I agree was kind of dumb, but I wouldn’t consider it a deal breaker. See my post on the matter of 2A. The main powers of the president have to do with foreign policy decisions which Trump has had a good record on in my opinion.
I said in 2020 that, in the same way that Jung characterizes Hitler as “possessed” by the collective unconscious of his country, Trump is “possessed” by the collective unconscious of America. The things that make Americans particular on the world stage — our entrepreneurship, our individualism, our maximalism, it is concentrated in Trump even if a lot of Americans find him to be distasteful. A lot of Americans hate their country and themselves, so it’s not surprising. And, I don’t want to call all of the qualities which characterize America good. But they are there. Although, there are good qualities that Trump has which used to be strongly associated with America but now aren’t. A lot of his foreign policy speaks to the pre-Wilsonian American dedication to isolationism. At least, insofar as this is possible in the contemporary American political climate. Aesthetically, he is a stereotype. A 6’4 blond, blue-eyed yuppie billionaire real estate magnate and television star who sprays tan on his face, loves McDonalds, and rants about communists and immigrants sounds like the sort of stereotypical American you would see in a foreign video game or TV show. But, he’s also much more of a personality. When Jung called Hitler “possessed”, he meant it in a more literal sense, that there was no “Hitler” the man. Trump, on the other hand, is overflowing with personality.
I certainly hope nobody is actually arguing that Kamala Harris is the better candidate from a right-wing perspective. So I assume all of the arguments against voting for Trump are voting for a third party candidate or not voting at all, which functionally are the same thing.
Here are some common reasons people give to not vote for Trump:
>Trump and Kamala are both Jewish puppets, so you should vote for neither
Well, I don’t think Trump is a Jewish puppet considering that Jews overwhelmingly voted against Trump in the past 2 elections, and this is particularly true among Jewish elites. The Jews who support Trump are Israelis, because they feel Trump is more pro-Israel and because Israeli Jews are generally more right-wing than every other Jewish population. But, Trump has no reason not to support Israel. A large part of his base is White Evangelicals who are extremely philosemitic, only being beaten out by Jews themselves. I personally don’t think we should support Israel because they’re a problem child. But, like it or not, Trump supporting Israel is in line with what his base wants.
But, even if Trump is a Jewish puppet, he is the Jewish puppet who supports tougher policies on immigration, while the other Jewish puppet is pro-BLM, pro-DEI, and promising to inherit the policies of a presidency that saw the worst illegal immigration spikes in decades. If you don’t like Trump because he failed to deliver on the wall, you should still vote for Trump because under Kamala immigration will almost certainly be much, much worse. If you don’t like Trump because you’re a 2A absolutist, know that Kamala has much stronger sentiments on Gun Control. If you don’t like Trump because he is too soft on Abortion… Well, turn on the news! Trump merely electing the judges who overturned Roe is literally the main thing Kamala is campaigning on! The entire Kamala campaign is basically “Women vote for us because we will let you have a bunch of random sex. Men vote for us because if you don’t you’re WEIRD!!! (translation: Our women voters will not let you access their holes). Kamala’s campaign is “Arguing With Holes: The Movie” with a post-credits scene of NAFO insanity and anti-White racism. Aside from immigration, the second most important reason to not want Kamala in office is that she had been on the record several times speaking warmly about reparations. We are now at a point where a majority of Democrats support reparations. The only thing that could stop the anti-reparations train is if the afrolatry goes too far and the other minority groups get jealous, but at a certain point I wouldn’t be surprised if they just start giving reparations to all minorities. If reparations are ever passed, that is a major blackpill. At that point, White people are effectively second-class citizens. I mean, White people kind of already are second-class citizens, but this would make it impossible for anyone who doesn’t believe in conspiracy theories like “White Privilege” to deny it.
>But that’s precisely why we need to not vote, to accelerate things and make the reality of the situation clearer to White people
This is a very naive approach to what makes people “snap”. White Americans have a lot to lose simply by going against regime-mandated beliefs like race denialism or anti-egalitarianism. While reparations and anti-White propaganda being everywhere would potentially encourage even most White Liberals to hold these beliefs implicitly, I doubt it will result in a voting majority because it would have to overcome the solidly democrat minority vote, which is increasing every election season. The only reason Texas will not be blue by 2028 is because states around Texas are shedding White Republican suburbanites who are going to Texas. And on top of all of this, even if White Identitarianism appealed to the majority of the politically active population nationwide, there is still the problem of the legal apparatus being heavily left-leaning.
I’m not trying to blackpill here. There is still plenty of hope, but people are not bound to simply “bounce back” from political repression which they have been coerced into accepting. For the past 60 years, Whites have had to put up with worse and worse conditions in a country that was only a bit short of a White Ethnostate within living memory. And yet, it has all been accepted. It has been accepted for two reasons: Firstly, our living conditions are actually much better than they were decades ago. This does not mean people are happier, but it does mean that people have a lot to lose when someone starts harping about political instability. People say we’re in Weimar — we’re not in Weimar. Weimar was an actual shithole and the Communists and Nazis were engaging in gun fights. Hell, even in American history, nothing today compares to Bleeding Kansas. The Nazis were responding to a very real threat of a communist revolution in Weimar Germany, something that does not exist in contemporary America. Maybe in decades, when the welfare state caves in on itself, things will change for the worse. But the last thing we want is for the entire right wing and any semblance of White advocacy to be snuffed out in the meantime.
Trump, Musk, and Vance have a much better track record on things like race realism than any other politician. Musk, I’ve heard, is kind of a druggie and might only repub “spicy” stuff after he’s surrendered to his cocktail of choice. But Trump has some keyed quotes about bad genes and France no longer being French. I think the France thing is an extremely common but implicit sentiment among White Americans. Family members I have talked to who went to Paris talk about how non-French it has become. I went to Italy and it was still very Italian, so consider going to Rome instead of Paris. It’s a better city anyways, more history. I know the Groypies hate Vance because he was following some of the internet Xitter RPG faction leaders rivaling Nicolás Fuentes, but it’s clearly a good thing that the impending vice president can follow someone who has called himself a “White Supremacist” multiple times, along with race realists like Sailer (I have to agree with the Fuentoidz that Sailer is a nuisance, but he did redpill a lot of boomers). I was never fond of America First, but when I found out that congressmen like Paul Gosar were connected to them I felt whitepilled.
I don’t care what the haters say. I’m having a Boob break on this post.
I hear she is Mussolini-descendant Trumph supporter… Not sure if this is misinformation.
>You shouldn’t vote because low voter turnout is a sign of low confidence in the regime
It sort of is, but what would the impact of a low voter turnout be? It would be a news story for a day and then everyone would forget about it. Americans are already about as cynical as one can be about politics, it’s basically taboo *not* to be cynical about politics. All small talk is centered around “They’re all bad. World is a fuck. Do whatever you want”. And yet, choosing not to vote does not reflect badly on the system as much as it reflects badly on the voters. Libtards just use low voter turnout as a soapbox to talk about the importance of voting and shame people who didn’t vote.
That is all. Go vote for trump. And once you’ve voted, vote again. Vote so many times. Many, many times. Many such cases. Start the steal. Or else, frankly, you will be trapped in a soul gem crystal. They say those who are trapped are often there for billions, perhaps even trillions of yuga cycles before they are sent to the Soul Cairn for eternity. Sad!
I will further pose the argument that Kamala is:
1. Black
2. Indian
& 3. Female
That's just a little bit too far...
>You shouldn’t vote because low voter turnout is a sign of low confidence in the regime
The best example of this being completely false is the current Labour government in the UK. They won with the lowest voter turnout ever and they're marching along in their insanity pretending that everything is fine.